Subscribe

Archive for the ‘Citizens Election Program’

Repressing the Citizen Activist

April 18, 2008 By: Heath Category: Citizens Election Program, News 4 Comments →

CTGOP hosted the second Chairman’s Roundtable Discussion last Thursday evening in Waterbury, in which the Executive Director of the State Elections Enforcement Commission, Jeff Garfield, and Beth Rotman, the head of the Citizens’ Election Program, made a presentation on how the new rules impact Town Committees.  Over 100 Republican Town Committee Chairs, Treasurers, and State Central Committee Members assembled to listen to the presentation and ask questions of Mr. Garfield and Mrs. Rotman.

The new Citizens’ Election Program (CEP) - touted by Executive Director Garfield as the “most progressive campaign finance law in the nation” to the pin-drop quiet audience - offers candidates for the State Senate and State House the option to participate in the public financing system.  Candidates for the State House who raise contributions from 150 individuals in towns touched by their district and $5000 will receive 25,000 taxpayer dollars.  Same deal applies to Senate candidates, though they need 300 donors and $15,000 raised to get 85,000 taxpayer dollars.  In both cases, the public money would represent the whole their campaigns have to spend for the entire election cycle, and they aren’t allowed to raise anything more.  They cannot accept contributions from PACs, lobbyists, or state contractors.

The new laws and regulations associated with the Citizens Election Program have a significant impact on Town Committees.  In the past, Town Committees were the vehicle that drove many State House and State Senate campaigns, with Town Committee funds regularly being expended to defray some of the costs associated with waging a campaign for elected office.  The new laws signficantly restrict the relationship between the candidate and Town Committee.  The most egregious example given at the presentation was the case of the candidate who attends a Town Committee fundraiser.  If a Town Committee hosts a spaghetti dinner and a candidate for State House/State Senate attends the event, then the cost of the fundraiser must be apportioned on finance reports on a pro rata basis to each CEP-participating candidate in attendance and the Town Committee.  This requirement, along with a host of others, creates a situation where the Treasurer of the Town Committee - always a volunteer position - is burdened with sifting through new regulations and shuffling paperwork ad nauseam.  Many Treasurers would rather resign their post - and they do.

In addition to the traditional conservative complaint about spending taxpayer dollars on lawn signs, little orange footballs, pizza, and helium - hey, it’s the Pizza Hut and The Party Store Stimulus Act - the Citizens’ Election Program substitutes repressive bureaucracy for common sense, and absolutely no thought was given to making the program simple.  Regular people who give up their time to attend Town Committee meetings, donate money here and there, and volunteer at events shoudn’t be treated like criminals because they are interested in the future of their State.  Mr. Garfield and Mrs. Rotman mostly avoid fault in this regard as they are charged with implementing a lousy law - though they have been guilty of some “bureaucratic empirebuilding” with some of the regulations they’ve been handing down.  The legislators who wrote the law are to blame - like Rep. Chris Caruso from Bridgeport.

Many of these laws were passed in the wake of the John Rowland fiasco, and seemed like a natural reaction at the time.  It is clear now, however, that our collective kneejerk allowed a particularly lousy law to go into effect, which will now be foisted upon those interested in the future of their communities.  A simply designed, electronic reporting system that emphasizes rapid disclosure of contributions, rather than draconian limits on who can contribute, how much they can contribute, and how each contribution should be accounted for, would be a better model for campaign finance in Connecticut.  But common sense and ease of use are rarely the hallmarks of state government.

Guest Post: We Are Here for You

February 04, 2008 By: Heath Category: Citizens Election Program No Comments →

 Note: The following is a guest post by Kim Hynes, a Senior Organizer for Connecticut Common Cause.  Common Cause is promoting the new Citizens’ Election Program.

So now that the Citizens’ Election Program is available in Connecticut, we are on the road to creating a level playing field in Connecticut politics. Hopefully more and more candidates will run under the CEP program, following the great state of Maine where about 84% of candidates now run “clean”. But in order to get to that point, there is work to be done. Most of you have read blog entries about Clean Elections, and probably feel familiar with the program at this point. But there is a large proportion of the citizens at large who (shockingly!) don’t hang here on the blogs or who are not part of CT politics inner circles. As well, even people who know about the program have lots of questions and concerns. So our task over the next six months is to SPREAD THE WORD.

What can you do? Help us! First of all, know that Common Cause organizers are available to come speak about the Citizens’ Election Program to whatever group invites us. We never say no to an invitation to speak! Do you know of any groups that would benefit from this? Tell them to give us a call and invite us to speak. In order for the CEP program to be really useful, people from all walks of life need to learn about it. In order to cut down on the number of uncontested races in the state, people need to find out that the playing field has been leveled, and anyone can run.

You’re busy you say? I know – me too. Work, kids, spouse, etc , etc . Plus, this is a Presidential year, so everyone is out stumping for his or her favorite – and of course that is a very good thing.

HOWEVER!

Think about what is at stake here. We can change the face of politics if we work hard enough so that every state candidate in Connecticut is a clean candidate. What if every single state legislator was elected without feeling beholden to lobbyists or feeling trapped by the money game? What if every single one of those legislators had time to really listen to their constituents? What changes could we make? What if the single mom trying to raise her two kids safely on less than $35,000 a year had a say in politics? What if she ran for office? What if the bright young Latino councilman from Bridgeport could run for the legislature and win? What if areas of entrenched party rule actually became competitive? What if politics in Connecticut became something that EVERYONE could have a real say in? We could change Connecticut from Corrupticut, to an amazing place – run by the people and for the people.

Common Cause is a terrific organization and has helped Connecticut take the first step toward independence from special interests and corruption. Help us go all the way. Invite a Common Cause speaker to your next event to talk about the Citizens’ Election Program. Join Common Cause and give a little bit to help us out a lot. SPREAD THE WORD. After all – you have the power!